jQuery(function($){
        $("#ticker").tweet({
          username: "@sandhockey",
          page: 1,
          avatar_size: 0,
          count: 50,
          loading_text: "loading ..."
        }).bind("loaded", function() {
          var ul = $(this).find(".tweet_list");
          var ticker = function() {
            setTimeout(function() {
              ul.find('li:first').animate( {marginTop: '-10em'}, 500, function() {
                $(this).detach().appendTo(ul).removeAttr('style');
              });
              ticker();
            }, 5000);
          };
          ticker();
        });
      });

    

Aug 3

Written by: Sundeep Misra
Friday, August 03, 2012 


Take a look at these stats.
Germany had 32 circle penetrations with five goals. India had 27 with two goals; that’s five penetrations less. Now that is the story, either untold or for some reason not wholly explained.

For moments in the first and largely in the second half, India did make forays but couldn’t tap that important goal in. Shivendra Singh, Baljit Singh Chandi, Uthappa, Sunil, all had chances and a few goals would have not only helped with morale but also ensured that the Germans were under pressure.

Tactical changes were happening. For the first time in three matches, you could see the Indian forwards trapping and playing onto the legs of the German forwards; if that was happening against Holland, we would either have tied that match 3-3 or won it changing the entire complexion of the Olympic campaign.

It’s good not to expect much from the Indian team that has only two players to have played the Olympics earlier – Sandeep Singh and Ignace Tirkey. But what are the other experienced players doing? Do they really need a coach at this stage to tell them how to trap a ball or understand the simple formula of how to pass a ball?

How come Sardar plays with such commitment and not the others? Sardar doesn’t give up a ball and is willing to roam the turf, passing, defending and even taking a pot shot at goal. Does he seriously need a coach to show commitment on the field?

On the hockey field, in an Olympics, your courage, commitment and wanting to win comes across. There have been instances where Dharamvir has been robbed off the ball and he stands there and lets the player run away with it. There are forwards who after getting beaten are seen appealing to the umpire but not running after the opposition to get the ball back. For God’s sake, this is not a Nehru Cup, this is the Olympics.

No coach in the world can come here and shoot the flicks for you. Sandeep Singh, basking in the devalued glory of the qualifiers, suddenly is face to face with reality – Two flicks that seemed like Geet Sethi’s shots on a billiards table. And in the mixed zone, India’s top flicker refused to speak to a journalist after the match. Attitude is standing there and showing courage after a defeat. Not running away from reality.

There are many questions and at this stage not many answers.



Tags:

3 comment(s) so far...

Re: 27 circle penetrations & the committment factor

You cannot expect the coaching staff to do everything. Players like Shivendra have been playing for years - he cannot even hold the ball. They behave like stars arguing with the umpire. Go and get the goals....

By Jagan on   Saturday, August 04, 2012

Re: 27 circle penetrations & the committment factor

The game against Germany has clearly exposed our major flaw, lack of top class match experience. Beating Singapore, Sri lanka and occasionally Pakistan is one thing but standing up to the Dutch, Germans and Aussies is another. Sandeep scores well against weak teams but his limitations have been exposed.
Let us look at the positives, we have learnt a valueable lesson. Let this young bunch get spanked a little, learn from the good teams, gain experience and Brazil will be a different story.

By Nikhilesh Roy on   Sunday, August 05, 2012

Re: 27 circle penetrations & the committment factor

Yes, there is only one player in the current team that stand out for his courageous display of Hockey. Its is Sardara Singh. What a talent this guy is for the World Hockey. He is one of the top 3 players in the World Hockey today.

In defence, Sandeep Singh is a big liability & that should be understood by the Hockey India. If we want to be the best, then don't carry baggages with you, & Sandeep Singh is one of them. Except for his drag flicks, what does he give to hockey. And these drag flicks work against lesser known teams only!

Time to invest on young talented defence players, like Rupinderpal Singh & William Xalco, and others.

Midfield needs Sardara Singh & Ignace Tirkey. I am surprised by the poor performance of Gurbaj Singh, since he is a world class player. Gurbaj has to click for India to win matches.

Need to get good forward line players. Its time HI & IHF forget their difference for INDIAN HOCKEY. There is no shortage of quality players in rural India. Scan "Bhopal, Punjab, Orissa, Haryana, Coorg". Team India needs them.

Chake De India. We can win the remaining two matches in our group against Korea & Belgium.

By Surjeet Singh Bal on   Sunday, August 05, 2012

Your name:
Your email:
(Optional) Email used only to show Gravatar.
Title:
Comment:
Security Code
Enter the code shown above in the box below
Add Comment   Cancel 
Archive
Search Stories
     

Copyright © 1999 - 2012 IndianHockey.com | Terms Of Service | Privacy Policy

Powered by Chitresh.com